![]() |
| Fox Street books - thanks to AI and all origin artists |
Whistler, Ann Patchett's most recent novel started the proceedings with Julie revealing the author famously eschews all technology. No social media, no mobile, no computer - but she has a book shop in Nashville Tennessee, which makes up for everything, and more. And it showed in Whistler, where as Julie suggested, good people and positiveness were in abundance - suggesting Ann P's buoyant outlook on life is founded on human optimism and not technological pfaff.
The drama of the book revolved around 50 year old Daphne reconnecting with her stepfather, Eddie, and how it was they came to be separated 40+ years earlier, shortly after their rescue from a car accident in the 1980's. There was quite a lot of discussion about the two main characters (Eddie, Daphne) - and some of the minor characters (mother Abigail, lover Skip). Abigail was the subject of some critical comments from a few, but perhaps (in her defence) her intolerance was symbolic of the 1980's. (Eds note: and here's an after thought. While Abigail left the marriage suddenly without any explanation to Daphne and Leda, surely Eddie's failure to keep his promise to Abigail contributed to the marriage break up? So much to discuss - nothing is set in concrete! Life is complicated! It takes 2 to tango! And other home spun homilies!)
Margie P saw Whistler the horse as symbolic, making two short yet punchy and meaningful incursions into the book, even though Eddie didn't make it in the end. But then, Daphne did finally find salvation in the truth telling 'whistled up' by her reunion with Eddie, when it was revealed how Eddie and Abigail came to be in the divorce court. As we discovered near the end of the book, it was not Daphne's insistence on a winter rasberry farm excursion in the 1980's (which resulted in the car crash), but rather Eddie and Skip's excursions of another kind which resulted in the crash of her mother's marriage. And so after 40+ years, Eddie liberated Daphne from her guilt when he explained that her finding help on the night of the car crash saved him, and the true cause of her mother's split with him was found elsewhere with Skip.
Everyone agreed this book gave us a lot to think about - from young Daphne's guilt to older Daphne's resolution; Eddie's thoughtful and caring approach to people and life; the effect of his bisexual lifestyle in the1980's and beyond; the affirming relationship between sisters (Leda and Daphne); and whistling others for help when needed and responding to the call; all neatly presented through Patchett's quiet, thoughtful writing. An author worth following we all agreed.
![]() |
| Pablo Picasso and Dora Maar (could you ever trust a man who wore such a combover and those sandals!) |
Generally, readers thought the implausibility of the sexual relationships between the thieves lent into the unlikeliness of a woman born before WW1 hatching and leading a plot to demonstrate against the imminent closure of the Victorian College of Arts. There was general agreement that this was the common reading of the book - a lighthearted, slightly humorous yet perhaps somewhat shallow novel.
And then it was suggested the lecture given by Fish on 'censorship' early in the book perhaps offered another reading ...'Censorship as you may well know is inextricably linked to politics....which brings us to our topic this week, The Reverse Psychology of Artistic Censorship' (p 33). The slide lesson followed (one highly regarded artwork; the other censored), where given a choice, you prefer to see what you're not allowed to. Reading the book through this lens, readers were invited to engage with questions around the role of art, who determines its value, its funding, and moral questions around whether a crime is justified when the criminal/s have nothing to gain. Sue suggested this reading had resonance with the significant funding reductions to the arts and culture in Australia today (ie 40 years on). So the question is whether drawing attention to these issues may have been a catalyst for the 'left' leaning Prewett to write a protest novel, albeit one masquerading as a lighthearted work of fiction. (Ed note: pure speculation. The jury is still out on this interpretation, along with whether it would make it a better book anyway? Perhaps we should ask A.T. Prewett?)
Some found it hard to get past Phoebe's relationships in the book - no rewind: everyone found it hard! Melbourne's city landscape including the dinging trams and busy brothels were discretely painted into the backdrop (as confirmed by the Melbournites), along with the poor policing and security practices in 1986 - and what ever did happen to Phoebe's shoes? But then came the moral dilemma skirted by the book - does an artists character and personality (in this case, Picasso who was a notorious pig to many and particularly to his partner/muse of 9 years, Dora Maar who is reflected in The Weeping Woman) affect your appreciation of their artwork? It was a question that will hang in the mists of time, as will the identity/s of the true perpetrators of the 1986 heist, the Australian Cultural Terrorists (A.C.T.).
![]() |
After a big long intake of breath Helen Goh's Lemon Curd Cake made an appearance, featuring Mrs Agnes Bowering of Prospect's 'Green and Gold Cookbook' recipe for lemon conserve (it takes a lot of stirring and makes around 650g). (Ed note: image is of Helen Goh's masterpiece with larger edible flowers because your photographer forgot to use her camera on the night).
This started a conversation about the ABC's 'Recipe of the Year' program, and the role of the CWA judge - Margie P suggested it was laced with blasphemy because in her experience they had never used rulers to measure lamington cakes or other CWA staples, including Anzac biscuits (colour, taste and snap were the benchmarks, says Mog). And the head CWA judge was quite the ascerbic ruler, often over-ruling the two other hosts (Adam Liaw, Pia Miranda).
Returning to our book discussion of Whistler, Cherrie walked us through the plot summary of an interesting play she had recently seen presented by a local theatre company - 'The Sum of Us', about a young gay man and his father. (The 1994 film with Jack Thompson and Russell Crowe is available on Stan). It reminded some of Douglas Stuart's Booker short listed book 'John of John' which has similar themes (along with some darker elements, as suggested by 2 caps), and in light of Ann Patchett's book, we wondered whether being gay was having a moment? Then we wandered off into reflecting on the age of the Booker winner (81 year old M John Harrison 'The End of Everything' - one for the hearty and brave reader); recommended Rebecca Perry's 'May we feed the King', and 'Winnie the Pooh', the latter to be discussed by Waleed Aly and Scott Stephens on Radio Nationals 'The Minefield' (on Sunday 15/11/26 at 11 am or your favourite podcast platform) because it's 100 years since it was published and is apparently a tour de force around moral thinking. Are you in?








